Saturday, April 25, 2009

To Have and To Have Not: Class Envy in Film Noir


[ a transcript of Matt Zoller Seitz’s video essay on 
THE PROWLER, which now seems to be lost media]

“Quite a hacienda.”

That’s the opening line of The Prowler, a 1951 film noir about an affair between a married woman and a Los Angeles beat cop who responds to a call at her home. It’s not just a classy thriller. It’s a thriller about class.

Directed by the soon-to-be blacklisted filmmaker Joseph Losey (The ServantThe Go-Between), and written by two more, then-current blacklist victims, Hugo Butler and Dalton Trumbo, under pseudonyms, The Prowler has all the standard (by now cliched) building-blocks of noir: Doomed love; furtive criminal plotting; desperation; greed; murder. But the film’s power comes from its recognition that all these elements are fed by a deeper, darker force: class resentment. The movie opens a window into the heart of film noir, and clarifies that every sin committed by noir characters comes from the same source: envy.

All noir is about brute appetite—about wanting what you don’t have and taking moral shortcuts to get it. The French critics who named this sort of movie—and praised its artistry and courage at a time when most American critics treated it as sleazy pop trash—weren’t just responding to the genre’s photographic daring, smoky atmosphere and existential weariness. They were also applauding the genre’s potential for social criticism—for tearing away society’s grinning false face and revealing the monster beneath. The basic appeal of noir was always prurient—the chance to watch sexy, impulsive people break some or all of the Ten Commandments. But running just beneath this spectacle of bad behavior was a river of discontent—a sense that the so-called “Good Life” taking shape in postwar America wasn’t really that good—that it was, in fact, quite toxic, because it was based on envy—on greed and materialism, on the desire to get ahead no matter what.

One of the most distinctive things about The Prowler is the somewhat confounding tone of its lead characterizations. Webb and Susan aren’t your typical noir couple: a ruthless femme fatale and her hardboiled sap of a lover. Aside from his blue uniform and badge, the male half of central couple, Webb (Van Heflin), is a prototypical noir hero—a failed high school basketball star quietly seething over what he doesn’t have. But he presents as a thoroughly decent guy, a knight in shining armor, and Losey shoots Heflin the way Clint Eastwood shoots himself, making the most of his study physique, granite features and imposing height.

Webb’s forbidden love, Susan Gilvray—a local radio host’s much younger wife, subtly played by Evelyn Keyes—is likewise dissatisfied. And although she maintains sympathy right up to the end, her appearance of normality seems almost as hinky as Webb’s. Her well-heeled demeanor suggests a pacified postwar suburban housewife, but some secret part of her is drawn to Webb. They have more in common than the fact that they grew up in the same small town. They share a suppressed but gnawing conviction that what they’ve got isn’t enough. And at times the burly cop’s increasingly vicious actions seem to fulfill Susan’s secret wishes.

Losey and his screenwriters were all left-leaning social critics—men who either were vilified or were about to be vilified by guardians of the status quo. The Prowler‘s happy-face suburban approach to film noir takes the genre’s potential for social criticism out of the shadows and places it center-frame, where you can get a good look at it. These characters aren’t thrillingly dark fantasy figures upon whom the audience can project its dirty daydreams. They’re uncomfortably close to quote-unquote normal. Their moral relativism hits close to the bone because it’s easy to see them as people we might know—perhaps, in the worst of all possible worlds, people we might recognize by looking in a mirror.








do u know the
doby decimal system?



5 stars
super saiyan
TREASURE











4.5 stars
nearing masterpiece






4 stars
GREAT 
a must-see!









3.5 stars

very good








3 stars
 Decent.
definitely worth a viewing
"Popcorn Jacko"
↑ FROM HERE UPWARD 






2.5 stars
of interest + truly mixed
hampered by disparate flaws





2 stars
has redeeming facet. 
Mediocrity creeping in






1. 5 stars 
 =  pedestrian







1 star
=  deficient in rigor







1/2  star
of little value

Friday, April 24, 2009

Viewing Journal: 4/25/2009 - 4/23/2009




THE SIMPSONS MOVIE

(2007 dir. David Silverman) 2nd Viewing: April 25 2009


view the trailer >

I feel like I was raised by this family, so naturally I'm crazy about the movie. One of my only complaints, and it's a silly one, is that it almost feels too short and compact. Hell, I'd pay to see a 4 hour Simpsons movie. Wouldn't you? 

While it lasts, the movie is truly epic and high-larious. It was one of my more enjoyable moviegoing experiences of '07. To me, it never feels like a drawn out TV episode (like STEWIE GRIFFIN: THE UNTOLD STORY). Other than the length, I was enamored with almost everything about it. & kudos to the original staff writers btw, I loved this screenplay. An almost perfect TV-to-film adaptation in my eyes. The 2D with 3D animation mix is pretty uncomplicated yet nicely polished. And I got enough of a dose of Comic Book Store Guy, so I'm all set. It's frustrating that SURF'S UP got nominated for Best Animated Feature (AMPAS) over this and AQUA TEEN. I mean the former is an entertaining movie and all, but it seems like it just doesn't have the same level of staying power as the latter two. If you ask me, leaving off America's favorite yellow family is a head-scratching omission. While THE SIMPSONS MOVIE may not be as great as RATATOUILLE, PERSEPOLIS, or PAPRIKA; it was still certainly a wee bit better than SURF'S UP. For the majority of Americans, fans & non-fans alike, these characters are engraved into our collective conscience; so it felt really good (cathartic even) to finally see them represented on the glorious cinema screen. I feel as if I know all of them personally in real-life, even though they're silly larger-than-life cartoons.







THE HOST

(2007 dir. Bong Joon-ho) 2nd Viewing: April 24 2009


view the trailer >

A dynamic & thrilling monster movie for the post-Sars virus post-9/11 international community. There's an intoxicating fable quality about THE HOST's narrative once it gets going; About how one family will stop at nothing to find their lost young - even if it means having to slay an oppressive dragon. The nightmare here being that the beast is personified by both a corrupt government and a literal leviathan. THE HOST has to be one of the most absorbing pieces of hybrid cinema from this decade. It's impressive how well writer/director Bong Joon-ho juggles the diverse tones of extreme horror, humor, and dramatic humanism in this movie. In my opinion, he's one of the most talented and accessible of Korean filmmakers to come around in a long while. And after BARKING DOGS NEVER BITE (2000), MEMORIES OF MURDER (2003), and now this; It's safe to say he's something of a visionary.. A visionary we should all be keeping a close eye on.










STANDARD OPERATING 
                         PROCEDURE
(2008 dir. Errol Morris) Date Seen: April 23 2009

The O.G. Boss "Director-detective" Errol Morris is back! And in a career full of eye-poppingly kinetic documentaries, I dare say that his newest may be his craziest yet in terms of visuals. (It may just be a documentary, but parts of it almost have the same energy of a Tony Scott actioneer). And it's more than a little fitting that STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE becomes a study of the complex role images themselves play in our new digital age. Through his usual trademark craft -- cinematic reenactments, "Interrotron" first-person confessions, atypical documentary scoring (Danny Elfman stepping in for Philip Glass), and brooding collages of archival footage -- Morris creates an expressionistic meditation on the media shit-storm that surrounded the infamous Abu Ghraib scandal. And I'm here to report that it's a proverbial buffet of food for thought. No stone of informative perspective was left unturned. The meatiest parts coming in the form of intimate letters, journal entries, & interviews with Lynndie England, Megan Ambuhl, and Sabrina Harman-- about how those infamously shocking photographs came to be. + how they affected the lives of everyone involved.. The vigorous hyper dissection on display in S.O.P. of the case reveals how some unfortunate and misguided grunts (some knuckle-dragging bullies, some emotional weaklings; but all mostly young/ignorant dumbasses) became scapegoats for their military higher-ups. Who, by the way, encouraged and gave the orders for everything that became scandalous. Several elements made up the way those de-humanizing still photos entered the popular imagination; first of all their content (obviously), but also the way they were intentionally arranged, and how some of the frames were even digitally manipulated. I think Morris inventively illustrates how a lot more than meets the eye went down that month in 2003. The most shocking and eye-opening part of the whole film for me is the sequence that highlighted which of the photographed acts were considered "Legal Standard Operating Procedure" or "illegal" by the CIA. You learn quickly how official U.S. policy is morally icky and more than a little fascist. The doc also really solidifies ones understanding of how potentially subjective news stories can be. Thankfully, Morris is not asking us to forgive these individuals. Just a sober clear look at the flawed humans at the center of the whole snafu. Already one of the better documentaries of the new millennium that I've seen and I think Morris' personal best work since THE FOG OF WAR (2003).




view the trailer below >

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Viewing Journal: 4/22/2009




MY OWN PRIVATE IDAHO

(1991 dir. Gus Van Sant) 3rd Viewing: April 22 2009


view trailer > 

One of the most haunting explorations of alienation and disaffected youth ever committed to film. The structure of the screenplay is one of the more ambitious things I've seen as well. It slips between a modernized Henry IV and the story of homeless street hustlers in waves; mirroring the narcoleptic fits its protagonist suffers from. Bouncing between a dream state and lucid consciousness at the drop of a hat. 

I've always wondered if the Shakespeare segments in this influenced Baz Luhrmann on some level to do his ultra-stylized '96 update of ROMEO AND JULIET. River Phoenix really brought a human warmth to his emotionally wounded character "Mikey" that I think very few young actors his age could have. It's the best male performance of 1991 in my opinion. 

Anyways, MY OWN PRIVATE IDAHO remains my favourite instalment of Van Sant's Portland Oregon trilogy that began with MALA NOCHE (1986) and DRUGSTORE COWBOY (1989). And still his greatest and most personal film.

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Viewing Journal: 3/26/2009




MOON

(2009 dir. Duncan Jones) Date Seen: March 26 2009




[screened @ AFI Dallas 2009]

When the credits rolled at the end of this, I distinctly remember feeling like I had just experienced something of a new science fiction classic. And the key ingredient that made it stand above its current genre brethren was its having characters that you actually give a damn about. It's a pretty common complaint from me lately that lots of these big budget sci-fi pics introduce philosophical ideas-- and then fail miserably at exploring them in any interesting way. 
Duncan Jones' debut feature, MOON, is a stimulating exception. It really puts the gimmick juggling antics of a lot of the scripts floating around Hollywood to shame.

The big A+ takeaways from my first viewing were: The emotionally complex performance by Sam Rockwell, the expert sound design, inventive indie production values, + the ambient musical stylings of Clint Mansell.

The high-water marks for cerebral space cinema are clearly SOLARIS (1972) and 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY (1968), and MOON is admittedly not quite on that same level; But it's a good warm up to heavier genre fare like those. If you love your science fiction movies overtly thoughtful and moody (SILENT RUNNING, BLADE RUNNERPRIMER, etc.) definitely seek this out a.s.a.p. when it's released theatrically.



view the trailer below >